{"id":128,"date":"2020-08-09T22:06:06","date_gmt":"2020-08-09T22:06:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fractionation.net\/?p=128"},"modified":"2020-08-09T23:25:15","modified_gmt":"2020-08-09T23:25:15","slug":"fractionation-in-psychology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fractionation.net\/fractionation-in-psychology\/","title":{"rendered":"Fractionation In Psychology (Scientific Proof)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

“Is Fractionation a real thing in Psychology?” Is it really NOT pseudoscience? The answer to both questions is “yes,” as this article will show you.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fractionation is perhaps the most powerful Mind Control technique ever existed. Its power comes from a number of scientifically-established facts about the human brain. In this article, we\u2019ll take a look at two aspects of Fractionation\u2019s power: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

  1. How it triggers the “addiction response” in women<\/strong><\/li>
  2. How it presents you (the Fractionator) as a sexually-preferable man<\/strong><\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Let’s look at the first aspect of Fractionation, on how it triggers the addiction response inside a woman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

    Fractionation in Psychology: The Addiction Response<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Fractionation works by triggering an addiction response in women. The more you Fractionate a woman, the more addicted she gets to you.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    With enough time and Fractionating, you can make her addicted to you for life. This is why we always advise caution in its use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Fractionation helps dominant, responsible men lead better and happier relationships. Their partners\u2019 addiction to them is a stronger, longer-lasting bond than just attraction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    As a result, the ladies are much less likely to challenge his authority. They put him through fewer shit tests. They generally avoid behaviors that are detrimental to the relationship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    One of the more oft-cited studies that showed the addiction response is a study published in the Royal Society<\/a> in October 2010.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    In it, Drs Thomas R. Zentall and Jessica Stagner subjected eight pigeons to two choices:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    One, they could press one button to get three pellets of food 100% of the time. This makes for an average of three pellets per press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Or two, they could press a different button to get 10 pellets only 20% of the time. This makes for an average of two pellets per press. This second button acts like a jackpot in a slot machine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Normally, you\u2019d expect natural foragers like pigeons to prefer the first button. After all, it resulted in more food per press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Yet surprisingly, the researchers found that six pigeons overwhelmingly preferred the second button. The remaining two pigeons were 50\/50 between the two choices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Overall, the researchers found that the pigeons preferred the second button by a big 82.2%.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Interestingly, they found the same behavior displayed by humans, and how they think about “wins” and “losses”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    This would explain why human beings tend to get addicted to gambling. The \u201cwins\u201d get overvalued while the \u201closses\u201d get undervalued.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    That forms the basis for Fractionation\u2019s \u201crollercoastering\u201d action. The more a woman swings between emotional highs and lows, the more addicted she becomes to the source. You<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    It\u2019s worth noting that modern society tends to advocate the opposite approach. Men are expected to treat women like queens. And movements like #MeToo<\/em> have massively discouraged even harmless teasing and flirting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    In a way, Fractionation rights many of society\u2019s wrongs. It helps fill a desperate shortage of strong, dominant men.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Now, let’s look at the second aspect of Fractionation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Fractionation in Psychology: Sexual Preferences<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    The second aspect of Fractionation concerns the average woman\u2019s mate preference. The study we\u2019re about to cite doesn\u2019t make the news often because it\u2019s politically incorrect. Nonetheless, it’s 100% factual, and that’s what really matters.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    A study published by a team at the University of California, Los Angeles in 2000 examined the natural stress response in human females. The title was    “Biobehavioral Responses to Stress in Females: Tend-and-Befriend, not Fight-or-Flight”<\/em>, and you can find it inside the Psychological Review journal, Volume 107 (or you can click here<\/a>). This is the definitive study which solidifies the position of fractionation in psychology and science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Until this important study came out, it was assumed all human beings responded to stress with \u201cfight or flight.\u201d Surprisingly, the study found that women DO NOT respond by \u201cfighting or fleeing.\u201d Instead, they respond by \u201ctending and befriending.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Here are a few examples of how \u201ctending and befriending\u201d manifests in relationships:<\/p>\n\n\n\n